The two large GSEs, or government sponsored enterprises, that provide much of the liquidity to the secondary mortgage market are trying to improve their still misbehaving portfolios. Their underwriting guidelines have been steadily getting stricter which will certainly help, but most of the benefits of that will come later. The home loans currently causing such havoc for them were originated around the peak of the real estate bubble and soon after it spectacularly blew up into small particles. Their efforts are now largely focused on putting the breaks on the losses they are presently enduring.
Mortgage lenders requested to repurchase GSE's delinquent paper
When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac audit distressed mortgage loans in their books and to their utter disbelief discover that their eligibility and underwriting guidelines have not been adhered to they can request the lenders to buy them back. Or they can ask to be compensated for the incurred losses. Fannie Mae's repurchases amounted to $1.8 billion in the first quarter, while at the same time in 2009 the same action brought in $1.1 billion. Freddie Mac, on the other hand, is to rake in $1.3 billion from distressed mortgage loans it sent back in the first quarter, whereas last year in Q1 it took home $789 million. For both the repurchase pace is obviously accelerating, indicating how feeble the housing market remains.
As mortgage lenders and servicers have to take back loans it saps their financial resources, choking in various degrees their channels of originating new ones. It can be especially harmful to mid-size and small banks whose revenue streams are limited, or heavily dependent on the home loan segment. Large lenders can better absorb Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's buy-back requests due to their diversification and sheer size. And should they still manage to stumble, as they obviously can with surprising flair, there is always Uncle Sam only a cell phone call away. Basically, that's why the recently-passed Wall Street reform bill was so sorely needed.
The entire mortgage lending platform is still operating under a big caution flag. The two GSEs are desperate to collect on these repurchases to give them some hope of a better future. These requests, however, suck badly needed energy from home loan providers who some time ago sent them carelessly underwritten paper. According to Freddie Mac, at the end of March around 34% of its unsettled buy-back demands were more than 90 days past due. Many mortgage providers simply lack the capacity to honor their contractual obligations. The weak is trying to get the other weak to pay up, making plain how fluid the situation still is.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Provided by:
Esko Kiuru
Mortgage, real estate and apartment industry analyst
www.BluefoxToday.com - syndicated mortgage, housing and property management blog
eskokiuru@gmail.com
My cell: 702-499-1006
The residential real estate market is on a turbo-charged roller coaster ride. One day the news is encouraging in the form of increased existing home sales over previous months. Or that housing prices are beginning to stabilize across the country. Pieces like that will get mortgage and housing industry observers and homeowners from Las Vegas to Miami all perked up and dreaming of a brighter tomorrow. And then out of nowhere all that good feeling and improved adrenalin flow is coldly shattered by another report saying that it's not over until it's over. And it may get worse before getting better.
Price-rent ratio is one good way to gauge whether a particular housing market's values are stable or not. The popular ratio is figured by dividing a city's median home price by its median annual rent. A pretty basic calculation that will actually say a lot. The national historical average has been 15, according to Marcus & Millichap, a California commercial real estate brokerage. That's where it again stood at the end of the third quarter of 2009, having retreated there from almost 21 where it had soared to during the housing bubble's climax in 2005.
The government has burned the midnight oil for months in an effort to help distressed homeowners deal with mortgage payments they can't afford and possibly find a way for them to stay in their homes. HAMP, or Home Affordable Modification Program, and other similar programs haven't really produced the results they were designed for, though. It is also almost single-handedly running the massive mortgage market today, pumping sufficient liquidity into it that in turn has kept interest rates record low. Despite its pro-active programs it can't do it alone. It needs the private home loan industry to play ball, which it simply hasn't done.
Homeowners who are upside down and facing mortgage payment trouble are increasingly being approved by their lenders to do a short sale, a process where the bank accepts less for the property than what the loan balance is. They amounted to roughly 12% of real estate sales at the end of 2009. Short sales generally are time-consuming and nerve-wracking and can cause to those involved in them heart palpitations and other physical harm. That often happens when there is only one mortgage, or lien, on the home.
Mortgage and real estate market aficionados continue to debate how to fix this bone-chilling mess. While the back and forth is going on the government has taken a leading role in actually doing something. It had to act because the private sector - let's call it Wall Street - ran itself to ground, effectively scuttling the chance it could be of any help. Despite plenty of initiatives to stem mortgage foreclosures Washington has had limited success, however, in turning things around.